Leave it to Orac to correct the misleading, if not severly reality-denying, statements. He concludes his article with the following:
Just remember, whenever you hear seemingly "scientific" arguments against animal research that emphasize how bad and inaccurate it is, ask for concrete examples from the peer-reviewed literature that show that non-animal modalities are consistently equal to or better than animal experiments to answer the question being asked. You'll be hard-pressed to find them.But then again, since when do we need science to influence our views?
No comments:
Post a Comment